Showing posts with label digital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digital. Show all posts
Thursday, April 13, 2017
Western Digital 320GB BEKT vs 320GB BEVT
Western Digital 320GB BEKT vs 320GB BEVT
Western Digital Scorpio WD3200BEVT
Unfortunately my drive has failed so no direct comparison will be available. However I will run pretty commonly available tools (No Downloads required), to get the benchmark score so you can compare it to the BEVT in your laptop.
- 5400 RPM
- SATA 3 Gb/sec
- 12 millisecond seek time
- 8-megabyte buffer
Western Digital Scorpio WD3200BEKT
- 7200 RPM
- SATA 3 Gb/sec
- 12 millisecond seek time
- 16-megabyte buffer
Go Device Manager, under IDE controller you should see a Nvidia NForce SATA controller if you didnt then you did not install the SATA driver.
Go Nvidia website to download and install their Storage Controller Driver.
Test 1
Test 2Next we run the WinSAT Detailed Test for more information how to run it see this post.
Note that I am running on Windows 7
> CPU LZW Compression 100.80 MB/sThe values in red is what we are interested in.
> CPU AES256 Encryption 41.59 MB/s
> CPU Vista Compression 297.90 MB/s
> CPU SHA1 Hash 459.58 MB/s
> Uniproc CPU LZW Compression 49.88 MB/s
> Uniproc CPU AES256 Encryption 20.91 MB/s
> Uniproc CPU Vista Compression 148.67 MB/s
> Uniproc CPU SHA1 Hash 230.29 MB/s
> Memory Performance 5024.46 MB/s
> Direct3D Batch Performance 53.83 F/s
> Direct3D Alpha Blend Performance 48.67 F/s
> Direct3D ALU Performance 31.23 F/s
> Direct3D Texture Load Performance 25.06 F/s
> Direct3D Batch Performance 54.56 F/s
> Direct3D Alpha Blend Performance 56.36 F/s
> Direct3D ALU Performance 31.81 F/s
> Direct3D Texture Load Performance 22.06 F/s
> Direct3D Geometry Performance 41.83 F/s
> Direct3D Geometry Performance 19.16 F/s
> Direct3D Constant Buffer Performance 19.80 F/s
> Video Memory Throughput 2831.65 MB/s
> Dshow Video Encode Time 8.18464 s
> Media Foundation Decode Time 1.24666 s
> Disk Sequential 64.0 Read 67.82 MB/s 5.9
> Disk Random 16.0 Read 1.58 MB/s 4.0
> Responsiveness: Average IO Rate 3.65 ms/IO 5.9
> Responsiveness: Grouped IOs 10.44 units 7.1
> Responsiveness: Long IOs 15.29 units 6.9
> Responsiveness: Overall 159.52 units 6.6
> Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor 0.0
So do the same on your machine to compare the results.

Available link for download
Thursday, December 8, 2016
The Church Collection Plate Goes Digital BusinessWeek
The Church Collection Plate Goes Digital BusinessWeek
There really is an app for everything
Dylan Ciamacco, 25, first went to the Los Angeles outpost of international megachurch C3 as a teen. His mom thought a lot of the young people there?in skinny jeans, chunky sweaters, and leather jackets?dressed like him. He?d emerged recently from a ?sick? (as in awesome) atheist phase, he says, mocking himself, and was looking to go back to church.
A typical service, Ciamacco says, opens with a band that would fit in at the Coachella festival, were it not for the Jesus lyrics: ?What a savior, my Redeemer/Friend of sinners, one like me.? (In one podcast, a pastor, sermonizing about society?s obsession with markers of achievement, uses an Internet-approved term of endearment to channel his audience, asking, ?When am I going to get my own bae??) At the end, a member of the ?worship team? will call on parishioners to tithe and pass the collection plate. But not all people reach into their wallet. Many take out their phone instead.
Ciamacco gives each week, using the Tithe.ly app. It takes fewer than five taps, and built-in geolocation means he can contribute at any of the 1,000 churches that subscribe?a feature that?s especially useful around holidays like Easter, when many people travel. Tithe.ly lets worshipers set up automatic recurring payments, but because Ciamacco?s paycheck fluctuates with his work as a freelance video producer, he tithes on demand?usually about 10 percent of whatever he?s brought in.
?We see people giving all times of day and night?
Although churches are saying a collective hallelujah that a new generation of devotees is filling pews, a youthful congregation has its limitations. Twentysomethings might find religion, but not a lot of them have found that six-figure job. They don?t carry cash?and what, exactly, is a personal check? Still, about a quarter of them use mobile payment apps such as PayPal and Venmo regularly, according to a recent Accenture survey. And enormously popular services such as Seamless, Uber, and amazon,com have normalized one-tap payments?91 percent of millennials use their phone to buy something at least once a month, market-research firm Statista says.
Tithe.ly is one of a handful of apps leveraging that spending behavior for the good of the church. Pushpay, which about 3,000 congregations employ, works similarly; worshipers decide whether to donate to a general budget or a specific program the institution designates. Another, EasyTithe, features a text-to-give option. It also provides technology for a Square-like credit card reader to await the faithful in church lobbies. Regardless of which app a congregation chooses, the point is convenience. ?We call it frictionless giving,? says Dean Sweetman, Tithe.ly?s co-founder and a former minister at C3 Atlanta. He designed the app with C3?s wallet-light clientele in mind: ?We see people giving all times of day and night. Nothing stands in the way.?
Apparently not. Churches using tithing apps report they see more donations, more often, from more people. (Subscribing establishments either pay a monthly fee or allow the app to collect a cut of each gift. Tithe.ly lets donators cover this; Pushpay promises churches a 5 percent spike in donations or their money back.) But getting parishes with pastors and members older than 40 to sign on has been more Job-like. Tradition is hard to overcome. ?In some churches, if you let the plate go by and you don?t put something in, you feel a little guilty,? says Brad Hill, who works in platform services at EasyTithe. To combat that, some congregations print out cards that say, ?I gave online.?
Ciamacco?s friend James Crocker, also 25, says it?s much more awkward to donate the old way: ?Putting your personal credit card details on a piece of paper and leaving it there? For millennials, there?s no way.? Ciamacco agrees, if for different reasons. ?I was so anti writing my name on an envelope?it was a holier-than-thou thing,? he says. ?When Tithe.ly came out, I was like, ?Hell, yeah.???
Available link for download
Labels:
businessweek,
church,
collection,
digital,
goes,
plate,
the
Friday, December 2, 2016
USB Flash Drives and the Digital Age
USB Flash Drives and the Digital Age
Professional photographers today are faced with two choices when it comes to digital storage ? DVDs or USB flash drives. Clients want to know that the storage device you use will keep their pictures safe and secure, and they also want a device that gives them easy access to those pictures. Given these considerations, USB flash drives are the better option every time. On paper, DVDs might look like the better choice ? they can hold about 100 pictures more than a flash drive, and they are certainly less expensive. However, it takes a lot longer to upload large blocks of information to a DVD and DVDs are more vulnerable to damage. Conversely, flash drives allow for a quicker upload of information, safer portability, and they are compatible with all kinds of devices, from smartphones to tablets. And in our digitally connected world, clients truly appreciate the convenience of being able to upload photographs instantly to their social media sites!

Created by the marketing team at Custom USB, this infographic provides detailed information and a comparison between DVDs and USB Flash Drives.
Available link for download
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)